Re: anti-bodies - sign of infection or immunity?
- From: monty1945@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Feb 2007 13:47:33 -0800
"During acute HIV infection, prior to the appearance of antibody
(window period or pre-seroconversion), HIV infection can be confirmed
only by the demonstration of circulating p24 antigen, or by the
presence of viral RNA or DNA..."
This is ludicrous. "Viral RNA" is smaller than the virus itself, but
no matter what has been tried, there has never been more than a couple
of particles found (which can be found in other conditions as well),
and they don't even have the characteristics ascribed to "HIV" in the
textbooks. Do you realize this is a total phantom "disease," in terms
of it being caused by a "germ?" It's like saying that a bunch of
people are inside an apartment building busy doing different tasks,
but whenever you lift the roof off (as in a child's play house), all
you find are things like teeth and fingernails. In this case, these
pieces of protein or genetic material are not specific to any virus,
let alone "HIV," whatever that is supposed to be at any given time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: anti-bodies - sign of infection or immunity?
- From: GMCarter
- Re: anti-bodies - sign of infection or immunity?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: The diminishing returns of healthy eating - about clogged arteries
- Next by Date: Re: The diminishing returns of healthy eating - about clogged arteries
- Previous by thread: Re: anti-bodies - sign of infection or immunity?
- Next by thread: Re: anti-bodies - sign of infection or immunity?
- Index(es):