Re: HIV infection theory confronted

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:26:05 -0700, anilswapnilhjain@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

A team of scientists from the Imperial College in London suggested
that the presently accepted theory may be wrong reports The Analyst
Magazine. I saw the report at

http://theanalystmagazine.com/july2007/101.htm

Wildly misinterpreted really. HIV causes AIDS...what's unclear is HOW
it causes AIDS. People who aren't HIV infected don't see their CD4
count plunge to zero over time.

By contrast, Duesberg has nothing sensible to say about that
whatsoever and never has. "Drugs" don't cause AIDS.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HIV infection theory confronted
    ... that the presently accepted theory may be wrong reports The Analyst ... People who aren't HIV infected don't see their CD4 ... "Drugs" don't cause AIDS. ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: HIV infection theory confronted
    ... that the presently accepted theory may be wrong reports The Analyst ... People who aren't HIV infected don't see their CD4 ... "Drugs" don't cause AIDS. ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • White Plague: Aids a made made Virus
    ... Is AIDS a man made virus? ... The Secret Origin of AIDS in America: ... In April 1984 Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) ... announced his discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS. ...
    (soc.culture.african.american)
  • Re: White Plague: Aids a made made Virus
    ... " Aids a made made Virus" ... In April 1984 Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) ... announced his discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS. ...
    (soc.culture.african.american)
  • Re: POTM - HIV/AIDS - its evolution and possible effects on evolution.
    ... HIV, when the evidence is quite clear that HIV is a "new" pathogen ... AIDS epidemic is clearly recognized as a viral zoonosis. ... attempts to compare the history of the epidemics at ...
    (talk.origins)