Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- From: monty1945@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:47:11 -0700
The "HIV/AIDS" nonsense is a good example of what I call "lazy
science" at it's best (or worst). If you just read books written by
the top "virus hunters" (not Gallo though) you will realize just how
silly this claim is. I've asked Mr. Carter key questions, such as to
state exactly what the "HIV/AIDS" hypothesis is, but I never get an
actual response to this question. Of course, in science, one must put
forth a hypothesis, which can then be tested. If you want to read
some evidence about the kinds of things that do cause what is often
classified as "AIDS," go to my free site and read the "AIDS debate
thread in the general forum:
http://groups.msn.com/TheScientificDebateForum-
Mr. Carter will likely respond with his usual string of obscenities,
rather than addressing the scientific issue at hand. If that doesn't
speak volumes to those of you who read this, there is little more to
say.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- From: GMCarter
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- References:
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- From: GMCarter
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Prev by Date: Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Next by Date: Watermelons, Healthy and Delicious: From "Sham vs. Wham: The Health Insider"
- Previous by thread: Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Next by thread: Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Index(es):