Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- From: TC <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:47:24 -0700
On Jul 7, 5:48 am, GMCarter <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:26:05 -0700, anilswapnilhj...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
A team of scientists from the Imperial College in London suggested
that the presently accepted theory may be wrong reports The Analyst
Magazine. I saw the report at
http://theanalystmagazine.com/july2007/101.htm
Wildly misinterpreted really. HIV causes AIDS...what's unclear is HOW
it causes AIDS. People who aren't HIV infected don't see their CD4
count plunge to zero over time.
By contrast, Duesberg has nothing sensible to say about that
whatsoever and never has. "Drugs" don't cause AIDS.
AZT's and other AIDs drugs have been shown to have side effects that
very closely mimicks the symptomology of AIDs. And many recreational
drugs have been clearly shown to suppress the immune system. So your
blanket statement of drugs not causing aids is misleading.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- From: GMCarter
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- References:
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- From: GMCarter
- Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Prev by Date: Sun exposure = skin cancer? Not likely.
- Next by Date: Re: Sun exposure = skin cancer? Not likely.
- Previous by thread: Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Next by thread: Re: HIV infection theory confronted
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|