Re: Sun exposure = skin cancer? Not likely.
- From: NoOption5L@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:04:07 -0700
On Jul 10, 9:08 am, TC <tunder...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:55 pm, Tim <T...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is the difference between sunburn and suntan? Not much. One is a
slower "damage", one is a little faster "damage". Do either cause skin
cancer? Doubt it.
Let's see... go with your 'doubts' OR the advice of dermatologists/
doctors...? Hmmmm... I think it's probably wiser to go the latter,
with people who actually STUDY the effects, and say it's best to limit
your exposure to early morning/very late afternoon sun (less than 30
minutes will get you all the vitamin D you need) and keep the skin
covered or try to stay out of it as much as possible the rest of the
day.
I don't want skin/face that looks like a prune.
Patrick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Sun exposure = skin cancer? Not likely.
- Next by Date: Re: Vitamin K & Blood Clots
- Previous by thread: Re: Sun exposure = skin cancer? Not likely.
- Next by thread: Re: Sun exposure = skin cancer? Not likely.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
