Re: The n-3 to n-6 ratio is nonsense
- From: "Juhana Harju" <nope@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:18:37 +0200
Taka wrote:
This study is rather advocating linoleic acid for lowering cholesterol
and decreasing CHD:
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Sep;8 Suppl 1:S42-5.
The role of dietary n-6 fatty acids in the prevention of
cardiovascular disease.
Willett WC.
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115, USA. walter.willett[at]channing.harvard.edu
n-6 Fatty acids, like n-3 fatty acids, play essential roles in many
biological functions. Because n-6 fatty acids are the precursors of
proinflammatory eicosanoids, higher intakes have been suggested to be
detrimental, and the ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids has been
suggested by some to be particularly important. However, this
hypothesis is based on minimal evidence, and in humans higher intakes
of n-6 fatty acids have not been associated with elevated levels of
inflammatory markers. n-6 Fatty acids have long been known to reduce
serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increases in
polyunsaturated fat intake, mostly as n-6 fatty acids, were a
cornerstone of dietary advice during the 1960s and 1970s. In the
United States, for example, intake of n-6 fatty acids doubled and
coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality fell by 50% over a period of
several decades. In a series of relatively small, older randomized
trials, in which intakes of polyunsaturated fat were increased (even
up to 20% of calories), rates of CHD were generally reduced. In a more
recent detailed examination of fatty acid intake within the Nurses'
Health Study, greater intake of linoleic acid, up to about 8% of
energy, has been strongly related to lower incidence of myocardial
infarction or CHD death. Because n-3 fatty acids were also related
inversely to risk of CHD, the ratio was unrelated to risk. n-6 Fatty
acids reduce insulin resistance, probably by acting as a ligand for
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma, and intakes have
been inversely related to risk of type 2 diabetes. Adequate intakes of
both n-6 and n-3 fatty acids are essential for good health and low
rates of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, but the ratio of
these fatty acids is not useful. Reductions of linoleic acid to
"improve" this ratio would likely increase rates of cardiovascular
disease and diabetes.
PMID: 17876199
That is a very interesting standpoint. I think that approach can work in a country where saturated fat intake is high, but in the other end there is the warning Israeli example where heart disease is high due to very high intake of omega-6 fatty acids and very low intake of omega-3 fatty acids.
--
Juhana
.
- References:
- The n-3 to n-6 ratio is nonsense
- From: Taka
- The n-3 to n-6 ratio is nonsense
- Prev by Date: Re: folic acid prevents neurotoxicity from formic acid, made by body from methanol impurity in alcohol drinks [ also 11 % of aspartame ], BM Bhushan, PL Carlen, DC Lehotay, AC Vandenbroucke, Y Adamchik, U. of Toronto, 2007 Dec., Alcoholism Cl. Exp. Res.: M
- Next by Date: Re: The so-called vitamin D2 has failed again in yet again another study
- Previous by thread: Re: The n-3 to n-6 ratio is nonsense
- Next by thread: Taking Care of your Fertility (How's Mead score in this area?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|