Biopsy Results Question
From: Tom Lawrance (no email)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: c palmer: "Re: Biopsy Results Question"
- Previous message: Rob Carroll: "Re: Feeling of 'drop' right after urinating"
- Next in thread: c palmer: "Re: Biopsy Results Question"
- Reply: c palmer: "Re: Biopsy Results Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:19:51 -0800
My last DRE revealed a "grainy" pea-sized, nodule on my prostate and
a PSA >1 . So my urologist suggested I have a biopsy which,
thankfully, revealed no tumor in any of the 16 samples taken.
I was, however, surprised to find that the pathology report failed to
characterize the samples as anything other than "No tumor present,"
considering that a pathologist evidently had to examine the samples
microscopically, and this failure still leaves my urologist and I
wondering what the abnormal area is.
Since the hospital I went to is a well-respected, teaching hospital, I
was wondering if the failure to characterize prostate tissue as other
than tumorous or non-tumerous is standard procedure elsewhere in the
country. In addition, I was wondering what the chances are that this
tissue, as opposed to normal tissue, will become cancerous, since my
urologist told me that if a follow-up PSA in 6 months showed a rise,
he'd want to do another biopsy.
Thanks very much in advance for the info.
BTW, the biopsy was completely painless, because it was done in the
hospital under mild anaesthesia, and I was out and normal in a few
hours . So I'd highly recommend that it be done this way.
- Next message: c palmer: "Re: Biopsy Results Question"
- Previous message: Rob Carroll: "Re: Feeling of 'drop' right after urinating"
- Next in thread: c palmer: "Re: Biopsy Results Question"
- Reply: c palmer: "Re: Biopsy Results Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|