Re: Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- From: HubbaBubba <HubbaBubba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:15:43 +0800
nanobiotech reviews wrote:
The article written by Elmer Cranton, MD is invalid....he is only a family practice Doc....and one on the fringe of medicibe at
that....he is a chelation doctor. Nuff' said?
The NASA study concluded that NB "infection" is still a hypothesis and that "For further proof to this hypothesis, screening of the NB antigen and antibody level in flight crew before and after flight would be necessary."
IOW, it's all still in the realm of the hypothetical, even for the avid proponents like Ciftcioglu. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- From: nanobiotech reviews
- Re: Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- References:
- Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- From: nanobiotech reviews
- Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- Prev by Date: Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- Next by Date: Nanobacteria are "non-living macromolecules"
- Previous by thread: Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- Next by thread: Re: Nanobacteria Alive per NASA, Mayo and many others
- Index(es):