Re: Cardiac Cath Help
From: LeeAnn (LeeAnn_member_at_newsguy.com)
Date: 06/11/04
- Next message: Dwilliams: "Re: It's okay"
- Previous message: Dwilliams: "Re: It's okay"
- In reply to: 14tonks: "Re: Cardiac Cath Help"
- Next in thread: 14tonks: "Re: Cardiac Cath Help"
- Reply: 14tonks: "Re: Cardiac Cath Help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Jun 2004 08:28:00 -0700
In article <2it2e7FqemneU1@uni-berlin.de>, 14tonks says...
>
>"Ed Chait" <edchait4@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:%Ibyc.22591$Yd3.16285@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>> I should have kept my 2 cents in my pocket, as I'm much more familiar with
>> non-invasive cardiology than invasive.
>>
>
>Nah, the way whatever that catheter name was mangled, it could be just plain
>"guidewire" as well. I'd leave your pennies on the table unless/until we
>hear back what the correct answer was.
>--
>
>Sheila
>To reply to me, add the prefix real. to my address.
>
>
Okay... here's what we finally came up with: Motarjeme diagnostic angiography
catheter by Merit Medical Products. BTW, it was guidewire and corrected on the
report before submission (not my report).
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Happy Friday.
LeeAnn
- Next message: Dwilliams: "Re: It's okay"
- Previous message: Dwilliams: "Re: It's okay"
- In reply to: 14tonks: "Re: Cardiac Cath Help"
- Next in thread: 14tonks: "Re: Cardiac Cath Help"
- Reply: 14tonks: "Re: Cardiac Cath Help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|