Re: Electronic Medical Record
From: 14tonks (mail.2.14tonks_at_recursor.net)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Previous message: 14tonks: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- In reply to: 14tonks: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Next in thread: CLJ1219: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Reply: CLJ1219: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:53:47 -0400
LOL! That should say "to make EMRs truly usable".
"14tonks" <mail.2.14tonks@recursor.net> wrote in message
news:2jtn7vF15baftU1@uni-berlin.de...
> I agree technology will advance. However, if they expect it to advance by
> dropping compensation for MTs because they have advanced backwards in
terms
> of production, they may have a problem. Either they will have to come up
> with systems that really do not require anyone to type into them, they
will
> have to make it possible to type the information with at least the same
> level of efficiency as is possible today, they will have to pay more for
> what typing is still required, or they will have to export all the work to
> places where compensation is less. Paying more may well leave them with a
> net saving, as there are other efficiencies these systems make possible
even
> if they slow down transcription production. After all, if you no longer
> need a file clerk pulling charts, you just gained a whole salary. Put
part
> of that savings towards paying for increased transcription time, and you
are
> still ahead of the game.
>
> It is actually quite possible to design in efficient export/import of
> transcription, as the few systems that have bothered to do that
demonstrate.
> Whether that is the final route taken to make Emirs truly usable is
another
> question, of course.
> --
>
> Sheila
> To reply to me, add the prefix real. to my address.
>
>
> "CLJ1219" <clj1219@aol.com57894789> wrote in message
> news:20040623111316.23098.00000532@mb-m07.aol.com...
> > >by enabling simple export/import to allow MTs to work with the word
> > >processors and tools they use now. The latter is probably the
preferable
> > >solution, but it exists in only a very few EMRs at this point.
> >
> > That would be cool. I personally don't believe that will happen because
I
> > believe technology will advance, even if people don't.
> >
>
>
- Next message: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Previous message: 14tonks: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- In reply to: 14tonks: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Next in thread: CLJ1219: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Reply: CLJ1219: "Re: Electronic Medical Record"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
