Re: OT: Bush Seeks Church Membership Data

From: Bob Rahe (bob_at_hobbes.dtcc.edu)
Date: 07/07/04 

Date: 7 Jul 2004 15:31:42 GMT

In article <20040706212501.11616.00000953@mb-m11.aol.com>,
RaeMorrill <raemorrill@aol.com.com> wrote:
>>It's the difference between letting a candidate speak at a church
>>(legal) and letting the church function as a campaign organization
>>for a particular party, candidate or issue (illegal if they want to
>>remain tax-exempt).

>What's chilling is the lack of understanding of the difference. I don't recall
>seeing Clinton get up and act all holy. Go to church like anyone else- sure but
>run on the "GOD" ticket - no

  Oh, come ON! You have a very (conveniently) short memory.... 

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------_------
|Bob Rahe, MIEEE, bob@dtcc.edu (RWR50)   /    ASCII ribbon campaign ( )    |
|Delaware Technical & Community College /      - against HTML email  X     |
|Computer Center, Dover, Delaware      /                   & vCards / \    |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Bush Seeks Church Membership Data
    ... >It's the difference between letting a candidate speak at a church ... >and letting the church function as a campaign organization ... >for a particular party, candidate or issue (illegal if they want to ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: OT: Bush Seeks Church Membership Data
    ... >> separation of church and state. ... It's the difference between letting a candidate speak at a church ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: Limbo consigned to history books
    ... member of the Church. ... the idea of letting someone else do my thinking considerably repugnant. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)