Re: Junk Faxes
Steevo_at_my-deja.com
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: 14tonks: "Re: Question regarding AAMT"
- Previous message: Judity01: "Re: Question regarding AAMT"
- In reply to: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes"
- Next in thread: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes"
- Reply: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:40:48 -0700
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:57:33 GMT, Margie
<nomoremargiesjunk@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Steevo,
>A very interesting read. A little snippet from part of the site:
>
>Q. Should I call the opt out number? Unplug my fax machine for a week?
>
>A. No it is way too risky...the cure might be worse than the disease!
>It tells them you read your faxes and they aren't wasting their time.
>Sue them instead. One person wrote in recently:
>
>I was only getting a few each week until I started calling the opt out
>numbers. Now I'm deluged with them and am ready to sue. If it's
>illegal, why can't they be stopped?
Yep. Sue them.
My feeling is under the law I don't have to opt out of the junk faxes,
and as long as they are willing to pay the damages set forth in the
TCPA law they can keep on faxing. I am willing to accept them as long
as they are willing to pay.
The government fined Fax.com 5.4 million dollars and have not
collected. If the US government can't get them to stop faxing or to
pay their fines why should they stop faxing you? They get paid for
it. Nothing will make them stop.
Until we all sue them and their sleazy customers, that is.
- Next message: 14tonks: "Re: Question regarding AAMT"
- Previous message: Judity01: "Re: Question regarding AAMT"
- In reply to: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes"
- Next in thread: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes"
- Reply: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
