Re: The site

From: Bam (scimedmonitor_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/19/04 

Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:26:24 -0800

 . I see something shut down because of the
> undue harm it caused someone else.

Perhaps *I'm* the one splitting hairs, but if emptystars was within the law,
doing what a blog is designed to do, then how was it that the site or owner
of the site caused harm? The one who caused harm was the one who started
making irrational and unverified allegations at someone else. The site
owner wasn't the one who did that, nor were the words on the site the one
that did that.......

So I guess I'm confused. Emptystarsdotcom I say you've given a day down in
Vickie's honor, albeit I'm not sure how it was warranted, so come back
tomorrow as a new day.

If people learned to own their own sh*t, such as the site owner here was
doing, then perhaps you'd have less strife.

If I wanna voice an opinion, it's legal to do so..... and I enjoyed
emptystars.

Relevant Pages