Re: OT - This just in...

From: Gdubson (gdubson_at_aol.comnospam)
Date: 09/08/04 

Date: 08 Sep 2004 17:00:07 GMT

>I don't believe I said or even implied that. I was merely making the
>point that Saddam did have the means to do harm to the US through
>state-sponsored terrorism.
>
>Mike DeTuri
>http://www.deturi.co

So does anyone with $50,000. We can't go after all of them, and I don't see
that invading Iraq has made us many new friends. It has only made more
enemies. It was a bone-headed move, but Bush will never admit that now.

Gisele

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT - This just in...
    ... point that Saddam did have the means to do harm to the US through ... >>stated that most terror attacks cost under $50,000. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: Entropy sources under WinXP
    ... Gawd, go admit a debate! ... Don't try to harm a ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • We Have Done as Much Harm to Iraqis as to Saddam
    ... We Have Done as Much Harm to Iraqis as to Saddam ... Search Archives: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/htdig/search.html ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Re: United 93 (2006)?
    ... Calvin Rice wrote: ... (And I do mean 'admit', unable to believe that you don't 'see'... ... If Bush is really thought to have said Saddam ...
    (rec.arts.movies.current-films)
  • Re: Top Ten Bush Lies
    ... So now you're saying that Saddam was basically ... There is verification that Saddam was involved in supporting Terror, ... those stories do NOT admit DIRECT 9/11 involvement. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)