Top vs bottom posting. WAS - OT - This just in...
From: CindyB (cburns_at_twcny.idontthinkso.rr.com)
Date: 09/11/04
- Next message: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: what do you think of this?"
- Previous message: 14tonks: "Re: OT - This just in..."
- In reply to: Judity01: "Re: OT - This just in..."
- Next in thread: Judity01: "Re: Top vs bottom posting. WAS - OT - This just in..."
- Reply: Judity01: "Re: Top vs bottom posting. WAS - OT - This just in..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:02:44 GMT
"Judity01" <judity01@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040911151038.08576.00000598@mb-m07.aol.com...
> I think I may start doing that if I can remember. LOL
>
snippage
> This is MUCH neater, too.
>
> Judity
>
> ((That's why
> I put what I write first and then leave the quoted post under it if
someone
> needs to reference what's being quoted ))
>
Many, if not most, other NGs prefer bottom posting over top posting and some
get into very heated arguments over the proper/preferred format.
I've always found it kind of amusing that we argue about almost everything
under the sun here on smt but I don't think I've ever seen this particular
argument here. Not that I've missed it.
- Next message: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: what do you think of this?"
- Previous message: 14tonks: "Re: OT - This just in..."
- In reply to: Judity01: "Re: OT - This just in..."
- Next in thread: Judity01: "Re: Top vs bottom posting. WAS - OT - This just in..."
- Reply: Judity01: "Re: Top vs bottom posting. WAS - OT - This just in..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]