Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2
From: kathycarp (kathycarp_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: JAM: "Re: Popup killer"
- Previous message: JMorngstar: "Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- In reply to: Margie: "Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- Next in thread: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- Reply: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:03:59 -0700
FWIW, it worked for me. I rarely get one anymore.
Kathy
"Margie" <nomoremargiesjunk@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:jgt8l0ludlnqio1ihil2volusi7go7mf5m@4ax.com...
> Well, I put my numbers on the national no-call list a while back --
> didn't seem to make any difference. I'm still getting an average of
> 1-2 per day. For a month or two I put them in a pile on my desk,
> wondering if I would do something with them. Finally got tired of
> looking at them and tossed them last week. Junk faxes continue. My
> new tack is to start calling those "take me off your list" numbers,
> even though I've been warned that it may have the opposite effect.
> I've decided to try that for a few weeks to see if it makes any
> difference one way or the other. I'm not gonna take the time to file
> any grievances any time soon, so I figure I have nothing to lose by
> trying it. Maybe at least *some* of these companies have a scruple or
> two and will indeed remove my number from their list. What a hassle!
>
> Margie
- Next message: JAM: "Re: Popup killer"
- Previous message: JMorngstar: "Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- In reply to: Margie: "Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- Next in thread: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- Reply: Margie: "Re: Junk Faxes - Part 2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
