Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al
From: SANDITYPES (sanditypes_at_aol.comshazbot)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: Gdubson: "Re: More MQ -- overbill rates as much as 50% on some invoices"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: More MQ -- overbill rates as much as 50% on some invoices"
- In reply to: Gdubson: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Next in thread: RaeMorrill: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Reply: Gdubson: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 06 Oct 2004 03:41:42 GMT
>I am in favor of litigation that gets people talking about these issues. It
>doesn't necessarily mean the litigants will be favored in court.
>
>Gisele
The purpose of litigation is not to get people talking about issues. The
purpose of litigation is to settle a genuine dispute between two parties on
points of fact or law. To use it as a conversation starter is a frivolous
drain on the judicial system.
Sandi
- Next message: Gdubson: "Re: More MQ -- overbill rates as much as 50% on some invoices"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: More MQ -- overbill rates as much as 50% on some invoices"
- In reply to: Gdubson: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Next in thread: RaeMorrill: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Reply: Gdubson: "Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|