Re: Interesting comments
From: Dwilliams (animallady2002_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: Barbara OBrien Smith: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Previous message: Donna in Texas: "Re: Word help please"
- In reply to: Judity01: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Next in thread: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: Judity01: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:52:20 -0500
Judity, I have great respect for you though we are politically on different
sides of the fence this time. I don't consider myself to be a Democrat or
Republican. I tend to think that historically the Republican party has
favored the wealthiest people and the Democrat party has favored the working
class. The reason I think this is that labor unions usually back Democrats.
The only bearing I think that has on the price of eggs is which ever party,
their heart is going to follow the money. Republicans have supporters like
Wal-Mart, Democrats have supports like the Teamsters. I know...DH got a
letter urging him to vote the Democrat ticket. Special interests.....either
party.
As for SS, I have proudly applied for my retirement too and having worked
and paid into the system since I was 14, I feel I jolly well have earned it,
just as you have. My worry is with a trillion dollar deficit how long will
those checks be coming....which is why I decided to take what I can get at
age 62. I don't like the past 4 years and I'm pretty sure I won't like 4
more years under W though I'm sure I'm going to have to deal with it.
Dee
"Judity01" <judity01@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041013150301.00243.00001270@mb-m26.aol.com...
> ((Lazy and stupid??? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
I
> am a Republican and work harder than anyone I know. Lazy, who's lazy, who
> wants the government to hand everything over to them that they want. Who
> panders to special interests? Give me a break.))
>
> Cheryl, I agree wholeheartedly with you on this. I was raised in a
Republican
> family by parents who worked six days a week to bring up four daughters.
We
> weren't rich by any means, but we didn't lack for the basics because of
the
> hard work of these two people.
>
> I'm also a Republican and have been most of my voting life while either
working
> two jobs or double shifts to get ahead in life and support myself with no
help
> from anyone else. I now collect Social Security but feel okay doing this
since
> I've paid into it since the age of 17 without complaint. I don't consider
> myself la*y just because I'm retired and WILL be voting for President Bush
> because he is the best choice.
>
> Even though I'm single with no children, I also willingly pay my taxes to
> support various local schools since I believe very strongly in giving
children
> as good an education as they can get. I pay property taxes that partially
go
> to hospitals I don't use since I pay for my personal HMO medical insurance
> without help from anyone or any government. People who truly are la*y or
> simply can't afford medical insurance for one reason or another are helped
by
> my taxes and yours and that of other people who go out every day to work.
>
> To brand people who prefer President Bush as la*y is the height of
rudeness,
> but then I look to the source for that comment. Don't you, Cheryl?
>
> Judity
>
- Next message: Barbara OBrien Smith: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Previous message: Donna in Texas: "Re: Word help please"
- In reply to: Judity01: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Next in thread: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: Judity01: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|