Re: Interesting comments
From: Anne Vasquez (annevasquez_at_NOSPAMhotmail.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: Gdubson: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: OT: dilemma"
- In reply to: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Next in thread: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: CindyThe Tax Lady: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:38:24 GMT
I had a preteen and had to explain it to her too. I also had to explain
to her why our press focused on something that should never have been
made public the way it was. She was one sharp cookie and was quick to
ask. Guess what? I don't think her morals have been damaged at all.
Not that I welcomed it, but I have to admit that we openly discussed
subjects that I may have been reluctant to address otherwise. I was
angry at Clinton, too, but there really was more to his presidency than
that.
Anne
The Brown Family wrote:
> Listen Gisele, if you didn't have a teenager during this period of time, you
> have no clue.
>
> Cheryl B.
> (and if you did, you were damn lucky if they weren't exposed to this)
> "Gdubson" <gdubson@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> news:20041015091651.22356.00001895@mb-m16.aol.com...
>
>>>Children are now been taught what oral sex is at a VERY
>>>early age. A lot of teens now think that oral sex "does not count" as
>>>'real' sex.
>>
>>Then shame on their parents for not teaching them differently.
>>
>>Gisele
>
>
>
- Next message: Gdubson: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: OT: dilemma"
- In reply to: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Next in thread: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: Susan Mitchell: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: CindyThe Tax Lady: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|