Re: Interesting comments
From: Dwilliams (animallady2002_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: Bush -vs- Kerry...."
- Previous message: Gdubson: "Re: Interesting comments"
- In reply to: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Next in thread: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: CindyThe Tax Lady: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:42:58 -0500
Okay, I've admitted my history isn't all that great nor is my memory. I'm
talking about the US Cole. On second thought am I blaming Clinton for
something Bush didn't do? Didn't this occur just before his election?
Dee
"The Brown Family" <r.c.brown@cox.net> wrote in message
news:IZSbd.18078$_g6.5710@okepread03...
> Clinton did take military action, Yugoslavia, Milochevek or whatever his
> name is.... I agreed with it. The Croations and that other group(can't
> remember their names) were slaughtering each other.
>
> Cheryl B.
>
> "Dwilliams" <animallady2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:UtudnQruPO2yafLcRVn-ug@pgtc.com...
> > Well, I feel I can be independent and make that statement. Would it make
> you
> > feel better that I think Clinton should have taken military action when
he
> > didn't? Would it make you feel better also that if he were running for
> > election I would probably not vote for him BECAUSE he didn't? His sex
> life
> > doesn't interest me in the very least and with all the adultery and
> > perversion going on in the world today I can't figure why people were so
> > outraged about his behavior, don't we see that and worse on TV and in
the
> > movies every day?
> >
> > Dee
> >
> > "The Brown Family" <r.c.brown@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:5oQbd.18058$_g6.17129@okepread03...
> >
> > > If you truly are independent Dee, I don't feel you would make such a
> > > comment.
> > >
> > > Cheryl B.
> > >
> > > "Dwilliams" <animallady2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:HuSdnbFpoK8RWfLcRVn-sw@pgtc.com...
> > > > What I'd like someone to explain to me is why it is okay for BUSH to
> lie
> > > > about things that affect our very being and it isn't okay for
Clinton
> to
> > > lie
> > > > about his adultry. I wonder just how many of his accusers would lie
> > under
> > > > oath under the same circumstances? No one, I think, really enjoys
> > public
> > > > humiliation. Besides, how do you think this came to light? It
seems
> to
> > > me
> > > > that starting with the Nixon era, the Republicans have become quite
> > > > proficient dirt diggers. Don't tell me the Republicans are any more
> > pious
> > > > than the Democrats! Again, I am neither Democrat nor Republican
> > > >
> > > > Dee
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Anne Carle" <acarle@munge.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:f56vm0d6eqon0ffv3e0kpep431u1blegii@4ax.com...
> > > > > You're absolutely correct that Clinton's "misdeed" affected only
> those
> > > > > directly involved...until to you get to the part of him lying
under
> > > > > oath, thus denigrating the whole judicial system. That made him a
> bit
> > > > > more than "offensive."
> > > > >
> > > > > Anne/OH
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: Bush -vs- Kerry...."
- Previous message: Gdubson: "Re: Interesting comments"
- In reply to: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Next in thread: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: The Brown Family: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Reply: CindyThe Tax Lady: "Re: Interesting comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|