Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit
From: Phyllis (phyllisnilsson_at_buckeye-express.com)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: Phyllis: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Previous message: Phyllis: "Re: Bush -vs- Kerry...."
- In reply to: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Next in thread: Jeannie H Wilson: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Reply: Jeannie H Wilson: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Reply: Bam: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:15:44 -0400
But don't victims of domestic abuse stick around because they love the
person they are living with and/or perhaps cannot make it financially on
their own? Seems to me hanging up the phone is a good way to get rid of
unwanetd callers, as is Caller ID.
Eliyahu Rooff wrote:
> Why would she stick around? That's a question we often wonder about
> when dealing with victims of domestic abuse who keep going back to the
> abuser and who keep covering for them. People put up with that crap for
> a lot of reasons, but it's not an indication that the behavior was
> welcomed by them.
>
> I saw a couple minutes of her on TV, also. I don't think she's going to
> make a good witness, but if they've got audiotapes, it won't matter
> much.
>
> Eliyahu
>
> "Dwilliams" <animallady2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:kvGdnTQ1Ip1-Ae3cRVn-tw@pgtc.com...
>
>>In a word.....disgusting! My question would be if she found O'Reilley
>>so
>>repulsive why on earth would she return to work for him and secondly,
>>why on
>>earth would she continue to listen to these long monologues if she was
>>so
>>offended. Saw her tonight on some talk show and she didn't sound very
>>credible and her lawyer didn't look to swooft either.
>>
>>Dee
>>
>>"Eliyahu Rooff" <lrooff@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:2tam3kF1tdaknU2@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>>>The complaint itself has specific quotes in it that make it clear
>>>that this was transcribed from a tape. The use of "[sic]" in cites
>>>is good evidence that they're not just going from memory. See,
>>>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html for the
>>>22-page Complaint. Just be aware that parts of it are pretty
>>>steamy... I've never seen one that explicit before.
>>>
>>>Eliyahu
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Phyllis: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Previous message: Phyllis: "Re: Bush -vs- Kerry...."
- In reply to: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Next in thread: Jeannie H Wilson: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Reply: Jeannie H Wilson: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Reply: Bam: "Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|