Re: Speaking of Fox News - Bill O'Reilly law suit

From: Phyllis (phyllisnilsson_at_buckeye-express.com)
Date: 10/16/04 

Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:46:20 -0400

And I'd add a fine for wasting the court's time.

Dwilliams wrote:
> Sticking around is one thing. This is not a family situation, apparently it
> involves her negotiating a salary to go BACK to work for him....money? I
> personally would not even consider going BACK to work for an employer if he
> had engaged in this kind of conduct the first time. She took his "word"
> that it wouldn't happen again? Gimme a break. It's a good thing I won't be
> on the jury, I'd award her $0.
>
> Dee
>
> "Eliyahu Rooff" <lrooff@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:10n1a96ksk0to2c@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>Why would she stick around? That's a question we often wonder about
>>when dealing with victims of domestic abuse who keep going back to the
>>abuser and who keep covering for them. People put up with that crap for
>>a lot of reasons, but it's not an indication that the behavior was
>>welcomed by them.
>>
>>I saw a couple minutes of her on TV, also. I don't think she's going to
>>make a good witness, but if they've got audiotapes, it won't matter
>>much.
>>
>>Eliyahu
>>
>>"Dwilliams" <animallady2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:kvGdnTQ1Ip1-Ae3cRVn-tw@pgtc.com...
>>
>>>In a word.....disgusting! My question would be if she found O'Reilley
>>>so
>>>repulsive why on earth would she return to work for him and secondly,
>>>why on
>>>earth would she continue to listen to these long monologues if she was
>>>so
>>>offended. Saw her tonight on some talk show and she didn't sound very
>>>credible and her lawyer didn't look to swooft either.
>>>
>>>Dee
>>>
>>>"Eliyahu Rooff" <lrooff@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:2tam3kF1tdaknU2@uni-berlin.de...
>>>
>>>>The complaint itself has specific quotes in it that make it clear
>>>>that this was transcribed from a tape. The use of "[sic]" in cites
>>>>is good evidence that they're not just going from memory. See,
>>>>http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html for the
>>>>22-page Complaint. Just be aware that parts of it are pretty
>>>>steamy... I've never seen one that explicit before.
>>>>
>>>>Eliyahu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Quantcast