Re: IC v. Employee question
From: RaeMorrill (raemorrill_at_aol.com.com)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Previous message: Donna in Texas: "Re: Travel with animals?"
- In reply to: LizzieB: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Next in thread: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: CLJ1219: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Nov 2004 02:39:39 GMT
>It's awfully easy to spend money off books, and you can't prove you
>DIDN'T spend it. You can't prove a negative.
>
I think that was the point being made. Sadly, so many businesses pull this
apparently they think you're guilty. There is no way to proove anything like
this unless, perhaps, you are living way too high on the hog for the income you
are claiming, but they sure can't prove you didn't give someone 25 bucks cash
that you got from a cash job.
Rae Morrill in Maine
"Ya can't get theyuh from heeah"
_______________________________
Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM!
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Previous message: Donna in Texas: "Re: Travel with animals?"
- In reply to: LizzieB: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Next in thread: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: CLJ1219: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|