Re: IC v. Employee question
From: Jeannie Wilson (jwilson421_at_comcastnospam.net)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- In reply to: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Next in thread: ChrissyPete2: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: ChrissyPete2: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:42:20 -0600
raemorrill@aol.com.com (RaeMorrill) scribbled here
news:20041115213939.21555.00000640@mb-m11.aol.com:
> I think that was the point being made. Sadly, so many businesses pull
> this apparently they think you're guilty. There is no way to proove
> anything like this unless, perhaps, you are living way too high on the
> hog for the income you are claiming, but they sure can't prove you
> didn't give someone 25 bucks cash that you got from a cash job.
Just out of curiosity - does anyone here get paid in cash by their services
or their clients? All the ones I know of around here are too "record
conscious" to even consider it.
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- In reply to: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Next in thread: ChrissyPete2: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: ChrissyPete2: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|