Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?
From: Kathi (kathi.mooneyremove_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: CLJ1219: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Previous message: CLJ1219: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- In reply to: SANDITYPES: "Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?"
- Next in thread: SANDITYPES: "Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?"
- Reply: SANDITYPES: "Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:27:17 -0800
Wow, 400+ lph. Do you give lessons? I use IT with extensive short cuts, but
maybe I am missing something. :)
"SANDITYPES" <sanditypes@aol.comshazbot> wrote in message
news:20041118080657.10502.00000442@mb-m25.aol.com...
> >On the other hand, those on other platforms before (such as MTShell,
> >etc.?) may seem to be "feeling" that they are experiencing a drop in
> >production due to a change in counting methods.
>
> I genuinely don't think it's just a feeling. I worked briefly for them on
the
> DQS platform and never could bust 200 lph when my normal is 400+. I have
my
> suspicions about what causes it, but the "legitimate" part of the problem
is
> that the ADT screen is time-consuming and you get credit for absolutely
nothing
> you do while you're on it, only for what you type on the white screen
after you
> finish it. If you happen to get a lot of short reports in the 1 minute
range
> (which is what I got on that particular account), you're actually spending
more
> time on the ADT screen than you're spending typing!
>
> I hope your experience is better than most I've heard about, Mariette -
good
> luck! :)
>
> Sandi
- Next message: CLJ1219: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- Previous message: CLJ1219: "Re: IC v. Employee question"
- In reply to: SANDITYPES: "Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?"
- Next in thread: SANDITYPES: "Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?"
- Reply: SANDITYPES: "Re: MQ-are cheating employees on lines?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]