Re: Verbatim transcription
From: JMorngstar (jmorngstar_at_aol.comnojunk)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: Phyllis: "Re: Felicitations Solicitations"
- Previous message: Judity01: "Is it 2005 already?"
- In reply to: RaeMorrill: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Next in thread: RaeMorrill: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: Anne Vasquez: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: VHOne: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Nov 2004 19:16:22 GMT
>
>BTW, Janice, you aren't saying the top schools are now doing this, are you? I
>sure hope not. It just seems to me all this does is reinforce that we are a
>bunch of stupid typists who can't even be trusted with punctuating correctly.
>
Rae,
That is exactly what I am saying. I made a complaint about this and it turned
into a free for all on MTDesk. So in thinking this over, I thought that I
should investigate what nationals want and it would appear that nationals want
it typed verbatism, which is the reason that the schools are giving for doing
this. I find it terribly unsettling. We are trying to improve the profession
and I think that this is a step backwards for all of us.
Janice
- Next message: Phyllis: "Re: Felicitations Solicitations"
- Previous message: Judity01: "Is it 2005 already?"
- In reply to: RaeMorrill: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Next in thread: RaeMorrill: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: Anne Vasquez: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Reply: VHOne: "Re: Verbatim transcription"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|