Re: MQ question
From: Anne Vasquez (annevasquez_at_NOSPAMhotmail.com)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Becky Young: "Re: Long post cause I'm still babbling and scared."
- Previous message: Anne Vasquez: "Re: MQ question"
- In reply to: RaeMorrill: "Re: MQ question"
- Next in thread: Sandi: "Re: MQ question"
- Reply: Sandi: "Re: MQ question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:57:49 GMT
I'm not all that familiar with Word, but I'm finding that I can pull out
the same line counts in DQS that I could in WP51 with ST after only a
couple of months of using the software. There are a few things that are
a pain in the neck with adding demographics, but it's really no worse
than what I was using before. I'm not sure why people find DQS to be so
difficult; at least, it hasn't been for me.
Anne
RaeMorrill wrote:
>
> Was that using conventional software such as WP or Word as opposed to the more
> tedious platform they use now?
>
> Rae Morrill in Maine
> "Ya can't get theyuh from heeah"
> _______________________________
> Spam mailers WILL be reported to their respective postmasters and AOL TOSSPAM!
>
>
- Next message: Becky Young: "Re: Long post cause I'm still babbling and scared."
- Previous message: Anne Vasquez: "Re: MQ question"
- In reply to: RaeMorrill: "Re: MQ question"
- Next in thread: Sandi: "Re: MQ question"
- Reply: Sandi: "Re: MQ question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]