Re: IT question
From: Su (._at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/05/05
- Next message: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: CNN-Girls sued for delivering cookies"
- Previous message: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: Florida manhunt for couple who tortured & starved kids"
- In reply to: Ed Chait: "Re: IT question"
- Next in thread: Ed Chait: "Re: IT question"
- Reply: Ed Chait: "Re: IT question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:38:09 -0600
"Ed Chait" <edchait4remove@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:36kectF537fbnU1@individual.net...
> I could not imagine how my 7.3 could be any more accurate than it is now.
> The only errors I get are due to my getting lazy with my articulation or
> words that sound exactly the same. Patient names also produce some funny
> results sometimes, but that would be true with any version.
Even when I'm dictating I don't use DNS for everything that appears, which
includes patient names. The bug-a-boo I've got is with numbers, so I stop
struggling. I dictate for the short version and type for the long version.
So, at this point, about how accurate is the product for you? Also, how
often do you have to add medical terms? What do you think your current level
of production is: [1] just dictating, and [2] dictating and proofing? ---
Just curious.
> If my personal dictionary did become corrupt, restoring it would be just
> as quick and easy as doing so in DNS.
It depends upon where the corruption began.
- Next message: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: CNN-Girls sued for delivering cookies"
- Previous message: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: Florida manhunt for couple who tortured & starved kids"
- In reply to: Ed Chait: "Re: IT question"
- Next in thread: Ed Chait: "Re: IT question"
- Reply: Ed Chait: "Re: IT question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|