Re: IT question

From: Ed Chait (edchait4remove_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/06/05


Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 04:33:33 -0800


"Su" <.@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dk8Nd.37669$BQ2.7530@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> "Ed Chait" <edchait4remove@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:36kectF537fbnU1@individual.net...
>> I could not imagine how my 7.3 could be any more accurate than it is now.
>> The only errors I get are due to my getting lazy with my articulation or
>> words that sound exactly the same. Patient names also produce some funny
>> results sometimes, but that would be true with any version.
>
> Even when I'm dictating I don't use DNS for everything that appears, which
> includes patient names. The bug-a-boo I've got is with numbers, so I stop
> struggling. I dictate for the short version and type for the long version.

I try the name out on DNS at the beginning of the report, unless I'm sure
there is no chance in hell it's going to get it right. If it does get it
right, then I know I can dictate it when it comes up again. It did import a
bunch of names from the files I fed it, so often I am pleasantly surprised
when it gets a tough one right.

>
> So, at this point, about how accurate is the product for you?

On a follow-up visits, which is the majority of what I transcribe, it is
amazingly accurate. I would say I only have to do 1-2 corrections per page
if I don't get too lazy with my pronounciation.

Also, how
> often do you have to add medical terms?

Very rarely on follow-up visits, but more often on consultations and H&P's.
Most of what I'm adding is drug names that are not specific to cardiology,
and syndromes, signs, etc. Still, not all that often. Maybe one or two
additions per report, and as I add them, of course, the frequency decreases.

 What do you think your current level
> of production is: [1] just dictating, and [2] dictating and proofing? ---
> Just curious.

I proof as I go and spell check at the end.

I just got done working for an hour, using DNS, and did 302 gross lines. I
get paid by gross line.

Just using the keyboard, I was doing about 225 or so.

ed



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Migration lab - DNS problem
    ... I sent to you an email regarding the report you requested. ... The CAB file will contain the reports ... >>>with DNS installed. ... >>>The upgrade goes fine, DNS is installed and AD works fine without ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Re: GPO Update Problem (SYSVOL access via UNC)
    ... 'zsjo25ap005.corp.mycompany.com' is correct only on some DNS servers. ... >As to the reports that I indicated, through GPMC if you choose a given policy, the tab "Settings" will display the report of the policy settings. ... If you right click in the report, you can save out the file. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy)
  • Re: Names missing in server usage report (recommended DHCP/DNS set
    ... SBS Best Practice Analyzer reported that EDNS was enabled. ... In DHCP, server properties, DNS, I unselected the "enable DNS dynamic ... in the Server Usage report IP addresses are resolved by the reverse ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: OT
    ... Trying another SMTP server didn't work. ... munged in the error report, ... but I've never heard of "no such domain unknown" before. ... Reporting-MTA: dns; ams17.chi.affinity.com ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware)
  • RE: AD Controller not properly autenticating, please help!
    ... Are your DC's pointing internally for DNS or do you have them pointing to ... Your primary DNS server should be your internal DNS ... "Andy" wrote: ... >> can been found in either the netdiag report or the dcdiag report. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)