Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?
RaeMorrill_at_aol.com
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Need Macro/Short cut Program"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill_at_aol.com: "Re: reading words/minute"
- In reply to: LizzieB.: "Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?"
- Next in thread: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 20:28:29 -0800
I would like to know why the
abortion clinics are protecting pedophiles and child abusers in the
name
of protecting a patient's (a victim's) privacy. Her privacy to what?
Be raped and impregnated and forced to have an abortion?
If it turns out to be not true, I'll not be happy about that, either,
pro-life that I am.
>>
If it is underage being raped, then that's another crime. Shouldn't
that be reportable to start? That sure doesn't give them the broad
brush to go after records of anyone over 18. Even if they WERE raped,
it is surely up to them to report it.
Can't have it both ways. I certainly am against child rape and FORCED
abortion, but on the other hand, I know the right wing would ban
abortion at any stage even for rape if they had their way. So if minors
were raped, then what? Are they going to force them to name someone?
DNA the aborted tissue to see if it was a family member (trolling) or
what?
I don't believe anyone should be able to stop a woman from having an
abortion regardless of her age (and yes if she can conceive and one
side feels she's old enough to give birth because they are antichoice,
then she's old enough to decide to terminate on her own as well
- Next message: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Need Macro/Short cut Program"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill_at_aol.com: "Re: reading words/minute"
- In reply to: LizzieB.: "Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?"
- Next in thread: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|