Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?
From: LizzieB. (blahblah_at_blahblahblah.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Jay Vance: "Re: Cyber meltdowns"
- Previous message: Abeille: "Medware on the move in India!"
- In reply to: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:34:06 -0600
Disclaimer: This is just what I heard Phil Kline himself say; my use of
"pedophiles" was to indicate fathers molesting daughters.
Okay, onward:
Eliyahu Rooff wrote:
> For years
> now, our society has been either allowing or encouraging ever-younger
> girls to dress and groom themselves to be sexually attractive, and now
> we're seeing some of the results. When a 12 or 13 year old dresses and
> puts on makeup like a 19 year old, teenage boys are going to notice it
> and respond accordingly. I'm not saying it's okay for them to -- only
> that it's happening and it's a natural response on the part of the boys.
> If we want to stop it, we need to tell 12 year olds to dress like 12
> year olds, act like 12 year olds, and stop trying to copy everything
> they see on MTV. We aren't going to solve anything by letting young
> girls turn themselves into "boy-bait" and then punishing the boys who
> respond to them.
I totally agree; mothers are complicit in this, to a large part, with
the itty-bitty beauty pageants and the emphasis on dieting and beauty.
Sometimes I wonder if they should just hang out their shingles as Madams
and be done with it.
I was sickened before I had my girl. Now I'm horrified.
- Next message: Jay Vance: "Re: Cyber meltdowns"
- Previous message: Abeille: "Medware on the move in India!"
- In reply to: Eliyahu Rooff: "Re: Wouldn't this be against HIPAA?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]