Re: Stupid question
From: kathycarp (kathycarp_at_comcastprivacy.net)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: djgordon: "Re: same long topic, different question"
- Previous message: Maureen Galvin: "Re: same long topic, different question"
- In reply to: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Stupid question"
- Next in thread: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Stupid question"
- Reply: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Stupid question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:56:24 -0800
Well, there ya go. I don't know the rule for that one, either.
-- Kathy www.ambergriscaye.com/villadelsol "Barbara Carlson" <bbcarlson@snappydsl.net> wrote in message news:arednUW5YsoR-d3fRVn-jg@snappydsl.net... > Now if only people would learn to use proved/proven--that is the one that > REALLY bugs me. > > Barb C. > "kathycarp" <kathycarp@comcastprivacy.net> wrote in message > news:VuudnWkfs4BFtt3fRVn-tg@comcast.com... >> <sigh> This is just too confusing for me to grasp right now. Maybe at >> some point in the future a light bulb will go on. (I did finally learn >> how/when to use "who/whom", so I still hold out hope that somday...) >> >> -- >> Kathy >> www.ambergriscaye.com/villadelsol >> <blupencl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> news:FHV%d.492$c76.367@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... >>> NO. I would type "The mess was cleaned up by the janitor" but if I had >>> some goofy doctor talking the way they talk, I'd type "The mess was >>> cleaned up by Housekeeping." >>> >>> "kathycarp" <kathycarp@comcastprivacy.net> wrote in message >>> news:C-OdnQE8BNGfY6LfRVn-3A@comcast.com... >>>>. They are talking about the people. So it's capped. I >>>>> read some long-tailed thing about "personalization" somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Really? Then would you type this: The mess was cleaned up by the >>>> Janitor. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Kathy >>>> www.ambergriscaye.com/villadelsol >>>> <blupencl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>> news:liM%d.432$c76.234@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... >>>>> Finally, FINALLY I figured this out and am comfortable with it. I hope >>>>> I don't get shot down. They are talking about the people. So it's >>>>> capped. I read some long-tailed thing about "personalization" >>>>> somewhere, maybe in the BOS. >>>>> >>>>> "Anne Vasquez" <annevasquez@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:o1H%d.383$c76.308@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... >>>>>>I can't make this look right, no matter which way I put it, and I knew >>>>>>someone here could tell me which is correct! >>>>>> >>>>>> In an op note, under the heading "Fluids Replaced", when they say, >>>>>> "per anesthesia", should I capitalize anesthesia? They're not >>>>>> saying, "ABC Hospital Anesthesia Department," so that makes me think >>>>>> I shouldn't, but it looks funny in lowercase too... >>>>>> >>>>>> What is correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> Anne >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
- Next message: djgordon: "Re: same long topic, different question"
- Previous message: Maureen Galvin: "Re: same long topic, different question"
- In reply to: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Stupid question"
- Next in thread: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Stupid question"
- Reply: Barbara Carlson: "Re: Stupid question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|