Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive
From: Jeannie Wilson (jwilson421_at_comcastspamkills.net)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- In reply to: djgordon: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Next in thread: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:29:32 -0600
"djgordon" <danigordon@bellsouth.net> wrote here for all to
seenews:tOm0e.51440$c72.19270@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
> Well, let me explain. See I can explain myself when I need to clarify.
> Considering you thought Rae was wishing death on you or some other
> such nonsense (and not even close to what she meant), then it was
> clear to me that the reason you couldn't explain to me what your
> comment about a moot point meant was because you didn't have sense
> enough to do so because in reality you were just talking like a
> sausage and had no idea what you yourself meant in the first place. No
> matter, I got my big belly laugh for the day. And with that, I'm
> following Su's lead and have got to get back to my files as talking
> about Terry Schiavo is not going to feed me or pay my bills this
> month.
>
> Dani (I expect I won't be able to keep from commenting on the Schiavo
> case for even 24 hours, but I'm going to try as it's said and done, we
> can't change it, we've exhausted our opinions and each other--so not
> gone, just drained from this whole conversation and needing to work
> badly)
>
> "Jeannie Wilson" <jwilson421@comcastspamkills.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9622B72A1D2C1jwilson421comcastnet@216.196.97.136...
>> "djgordon" <danigordon@bellsouth.net> wrote here for all to
>> seenews:PAm0e.51395$c72.26100@bignews3.bellsouth.net:
>>
>> > OMG. LMAO. Now I see why you can't explain to me what you meant by
>> > that comment. You have no idea what it meant either if you don't
>> > understand what Rae was talking about. I don't always understand
>> > Rae's more vague comments, but even I knew she wasn't wishing death
>> > on you or even talking about you dying or even REALLY being on a
>> > bicycle. LOL
>> >
>>
>> Huh? You see why I cannot explain to you what _I_ meant by my
>> comment because _I_ don't know what I meant either? Now _that_ I
>> don't
> understand.
>> I knew what I meant by my comment. You didn't. Lordy, how many
>> times do we have to go around and around with it?
>>
>> I admit to opening and closing quite a few of her posts because of
>> her hateful comments in the past so I could have misunderstood. No
>> skin off
> my
>> nose to admit it.
>>
>
>
And this is precisely the reason so many of the people who used to post
here don't. All those people I was warned would turn on me when I dared
disagree with them..you know...the bullies who would eat the heads of their
young?? One cannot post a difference of opinion here without insults being
hurled.
- Next message: Jeannie Wilson: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- In reply to: djgordon: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Next in thread: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Reply: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|