Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive
From: RaeMorrill (RaeMorrill_at_aol.com)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: What does this mean?"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- In reply to: Sandi: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Next in thread: djgordon: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:51:42 GMT
Sandi wrote:
>>Why is it that as soon as something goes against you, instead of facing it
>>squarely, you start talking about how someone is being predictable and
>>effectively avoid what the original issue was? Every time, Jeannie,
>
> whether
>
>>it's me or Rae or....oh wait a minute, just me and Rae because we seem to
>
> be
>
>>the only ones who call you out. Answering is difficult, avoiding is easy.
>>
>>Dani
>>
>
> Depends on what you mean by "calling her out." I think a couple others of
> us have disagreed with the very same points. Granted, I never saw myself as
> "calling anybody out," and frankly, who has the right to do that to someone
> expressing their opinion on a newsgroup?
>
> Sandi
>
>
Gotta agree, Sandi, particularly when it is simply matter of strong
opinions, not just casual disagreements over petty things.
- Next message: RaeMorrill: "Re: What does this mean?"
- Previous message: RaeMorrill: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- In reply to: Sandi: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Next in thread: djgordon: "Re: U.S. House panel to seek to keep Schiavo alive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|