Re: I finally realize why liberals want Terri Schiavo dead

From: North (north_at_the_shack.com)
Date: 03/30/05 

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:31:08 -0500

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:45:46 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
<gburnore@databasix.com> said:

>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:33:35 GMT, "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>"Felix D." <#1Chekist@OGPU.net> wrote in message
>>news:XaWdnbQKc6fJkNffRVn-3Q@comcast.com...
>>>
>>> "ggamble" <ff@net-kooks.com> wrote in message
>>> news:91lj411cg4fbqj6grtea7gspl5qs97ic8q@4ax.com...
>>>> On 29 Mar 2005 12:43:57 -0800, "ugottarubmedariteway"
>>>> <ugottarubmedariteway@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Reading these posts and seeing liberals pathetically attempt to justify
>>>> >Schiavo being starved to death, I came across a few common arguments:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You've got it wrong before your horse is even out of the gate.
>>>>
>>>> Support for the decision to withdraw the feeding tube cuts right
>>>> across the political spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> Condemnation of Bush, Rove, Delay et. al. for attempting to subvert
>>>> the constitution by making the entire affair a Federal matter cuts
>>>> right across the political spectrum.
>>>
>>> No - only in San Francisco, New York, and LA.
>>
>>The vast majority (around 80%) of Americans agree that Bush and Congress
>>went to far on this one.
>
>
>And the 9 or 10% who agreed with Bush and Congress are whining
>neocons.

Jessie Jackson is a neo-con ?