Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: RaeMorrill <RaeMorrill@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:02:40 GMT
Yup, someone did! LOL. You
Griz wrote:
....... I'm sure someone has brought religion into it!!
Daaaaaaaaamn I miss you guys!! LOL!
"Sandi" <sanditypes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:3g14ucFa3u56U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Gisele" <Gisele.1putyu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Gisele.1putyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sandi Wrote:
" I'd agree that it is, but I also would disagree that it's directed at gay people themselves, and would be more of a joke that a gay person might tell about a bigoted idiot.
Sandi
A person can be gay and still have poor taste in humor.
-- Gisele
Again, I agree with that, but it's obvious that the reason it was deemed offensive was that the person thought it was a joke against gay people,
not
that she thought it was a tasteless joke against bigots which used homosexuality as its subject matter. A joke can't be a "hate crime," even using hyperbole, against bigots, can it?
Sandi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Griz
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- References:
- Titled "So Precious"
- From: DJGordon
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: DJGordon
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: DJGordon
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: DJGordon
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Sandi
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Gisele
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Sandi
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Gisele
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Sandi
- Re: Titled "So Precious"
- From: Griz
- Titled "So Precious"
- Prev by Date: Re: So what's new..
- Next by Date: Re: So what's new..
- Previous by thread: Re: Titled "So Precious"
- Next by thread: Re: Titled "So Precious"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|