Re: Presidential IQs
- From: "DJGordon" <danigordon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:57:51 -0500
Clinton was a very good president, moral or not. What he and his wife went
through in their personal marriage was really none of our business. It's not
the best example by a national leader, but I've known cheaters before and
their whole life isn't displayed for the public to view. That was Hillary's
job to take him to task, not us. I also think he was a very good president
and one of the smartest. And considering I think Reagan was also a great,
that says that it's not my Democratic bias.
dani
"Tallulah" <tallulahbankrupt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1120747186.106061.48700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I used to get excited about politics, but after all that with Clinton,
> (and I did think he was a brilliant president), I just lost the
> enthusiasm. I'm sure everyone will go into tirades about how awful
> Clinton was, but I didn't really care who he was doing, as long as he
> did a good job in the oval office (and here come the jokes about
> certain "jobs" being performed in the oval office, I'm sure). <G>
>
> I just got disgusted with the full-time Ken Starr thing - and now with
> Enron, and now Karl Rove, (not to mention this war)...I don't get why
> some presidents are put under the microscope, and some aren't.
>
.
- References:
- Presidential IQs
- From: kathycarp
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: JulieW8
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: Susan Mitchell
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: JulieW8
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: VickieHerndonCMT
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: JulieW8
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: Tallulah
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: Presidential IQs
- From: Tallulah
- Presidential IQs
- Prev by Date: Re: Happy Numbers
- Next by Date: Career Colleges - Vocational and Technical programs
- Previous by thread: Re: Presidential IQs
- Next by thread: Re: Presidential IQs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
