Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: "LizzieB." <blahblah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:47:12 -0500
RaeMorrill wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why openly speculating about someone by name is any different from what the anonymous poster did.
Well, Rae, I'll tell you. The last time someone speculated that an anonymous poster was someone (and didn't just come out and ask), a whole lot of people got their feelings and reputations and friendships ruined.
So...I asked point blank. I can't be accused of speculating because I didn't say, "Oh, I think it's this person or that person or some other person who may or may not go by this name." I just asked.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: VickieHerndonCMT
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: Jeannie Wilson
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- References:
- We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: fish . cheer
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: LizzieB.
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: Nae
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: DJGordon
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: Nae
- Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- From: RaeMorrill
- We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting view on fee increase
- Next by Date: Re: Hope nobody needs help!
- Previous by thread: Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- Next by thread: Re: We won't get fooled again! MedWare problems
- Index(es):