Re: Hope nobody needs help!

I have to agree. I had no desire to find out "who" amie was talking about. I
took her post as a hypothetical more than anything (I know it was her
experience, but still in hypothetical terms), so I don't think you had to be
concerned about people talking behind the scenes. It wasn't that interesting
to be worth snooping into something like that. What's that word you used, oh
yeah, paranoid.

Dani

"RaeMorrill" <RaeMorrill@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E31Pe.30510$Hx4.25988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Actually, didnt nip it in the bud. I had no idea anyone was associated
> with you until you said something. Now I'd love to hear Amy's side of the
> story (email me Amy), whereas before I had no clue you were even involved
> as my responses were mostly based on Laura's situation.
>
> Jeannie Wilson wrote:
>> "amiebobamie" <k6c4t32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote here for all to
>> seenews:he0Pe.2715$Ma3.1345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>Well gee Jeannie ... thanks for throwing my name out there! I just
>>>posted about some general observations about a working relationship I
>>>had and some questions about the IC/employee relationship in a thread
>>>discussing just that. No, I am not paranoid, but I know you pretty
>>>well ... 'nuff said.
>>>
>>>>"However, did you ever present yourself as an IC or did
>>>>you just "take it as you got it" and never act as an independent
>>>>contractor
>>>>in any way?"
>>>
>>>I sure did pay taxes like an independent contractor. "Take it as I
>>>got it"? Not sure what you mean by that.
>>>
>>>Don't get frumped up over my post. It was just a general question in
>>>which I never posted your name and did not intend to do so. No one
>>>would have been the wiser it was you I was referring to. Again, I was
>>>just looking for some opinions and others' experiences with that fuzzy
>>>IC/employee line.
>>
>>
>> You had already posted your name in a previous (old post) so it is not
>> like I said anything that people didn't already know or couldn't find
>> out. It had also been stated here that you had worked with me. No
>> reason to leave anything to speculation so I stated that it was me you
>> were referring to. Nice of you to bring it here instead of just speaking
>> to me, though. As far as "nuff said" about you "knowing me". I have no
>> idea what you are talking about as you have yet to bring one single issue
>> to me and all of the cards and notes I had gotten from you in the past
>> stated nothing but the opposite of what you are insinuating here. I'm
>> not frumped up over anything. I am just leaving nothing to speculation
>> as I have seen that happen here umpteen times. People pull old posts,
>> see who is connected how and then the rumors fly behind the scenes. I
>> nipped that in the bud. I honestly couldn't care less that you posted
>> what you did here. I responded to it. If you are upset by that, then I
>> apologize but this is a public forum and you know I read and participate
>> here so to come here and make insinuations and voice suspicions and
>> expect me not to respond is just ridiculous.


.

Quantcast