Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG

Actually, you're mistaken. I'm not thinking of Justin at all during this
unless he is brought up in the disabled aspect. I know myself and I know for
100% that no matter what the issue I would not put a child in a cage for any
reason. I may cry and scream and be hurt or what have you, but I would be
working on getting meds right to help control violent outbursts, I would do
my best to understand what was going on, etc., but that child would not be
in a cage. I'm not saying I could even pull it off, but I still know for
absolute fact that it would never enter my mind to build a cage to have that
child in at night.

Of course, I wouldn't be so ignorant as to take on more than I knew I could
possibly handle either. They may have started out feeling they were doing
the right thing, helping out some unfortunate kids, but look where it got
them....and if neither really is working, what business do they have taking
on 11 kids. It's most of you on here that are always griping about your tax
dollars going to help people who have put themselves in these type of
situations .... well they made the choice (for money, for ignorance, for
whatever reason, they made it) and now they are suffering the consequences
because they couldn't handle it.

Dani

--
www.menkessyndrome.com
"RaeMorrill" <RaeMorrill@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tOVXe.84205$EX.76761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dani
>
> I know all you are seeing is your child when this is being discussed, but
> how can you think you'd let a child known to have homicidal, suicidal,
> fire-starting, or sexual preditor tendencies be unconfined in your home.
> Cage or not, they would still need to be somehow locked up or confined to
> prevent hurting you or your family or getting out and hurting someone
> else. As stated before, the use of the word "cage" is a bit inflammatory.
> If someone called it a Vail bed or a crib or anything else, it wouldnt be
> looked at as so bad. A couple of people with experience with these
> seriously damaged children have spoken of how dangerous they can be.
>
> DJGordon wrote:
>> Well, I have to jump in on this and put it this way....if better means
>> not putting them in cages, then yes, I could do better.
>>
>> Dani
>>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG
    ... I am pretty sure i never said "kids should be kept ... >were to put a child in an upside down playpen, is that not a cage? ... If I put my 3 foot child into a 4 ... >same - but I do understand the safety/security need to confine some ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG
    ... But I thought you were one of those reserving judgment too until the facts ... > loving one, that comes near it, these kids are responding at a primal ... >> for 100% that no matter what the issue I would not put a child in a cage ... >> would not be in a cage. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG
    ... I know all you are seeing is your child when this is being discussed, but how can you think you'd let a child known to have homicidal, suicidal, fire-starting, or sexual preditor tendencies be unconfined in your home. ... Cage or not, they would still need to be somehow locked up or confined to prevent hurting you or your family or getting out and hurting someone else. ... the use of the word "cage" is a bit inflammatory. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG
    ... > not cage any child. ... Confinement for safety and the makeshift contraptions described on the news ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG
    ... I've never said anyone on here was wrong...that was reserved for Phyllis. ... These are our belief systems and opinions...we just happen to disagree with ... still never convince me a cage is "right"....but then again, ... Dani ...
    (sci.med.transcription)