Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: Jeannie Wilson <jwilson421@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:11:09 -0600
"DJGordon" <danigordon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote here for all to
seenews:x0oef.30094$td.3345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> That's the way I took it. The sub was flagging it, Jeannie was fixing
> it, and the sub was then saying she couldn't work for someone who
> asked her to type something incorrectly. That something being
> Arthrotec 75 which does not meant that the mg is 75....
>
> Jeannie, if that sub cannot understand that, you're better off without
> the headache. We are supposed to be intelligent comprehending people.
You took it correctly as well. I am glad she's gone. I don't have time for
that. She left a blank. I filled it in. She told me I was wrong. I proved
otherwise and she quit, telling me I was still wrong because another
service she had previously worked for had them "look for things like that"
and she could not knowingly enter something incorrect into a report. I
asked numerous times for her to show me where it was incorrect, even
stating that I had spoken with the doc, seen the sample package, looked it
up online, looked in books, etc. Good riddance is all I can say now -
especially after editing the rest of the work.
.
- References:
- Arthrotec 75
- From: Jeannie Wilson
- Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: Tallulah
- Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: Jeannie Wilson
- Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: Jeannie Wilson
- Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: Sandi
- Re: Arthrotec 75
- From: DJGordon
- Arthrotec 75
- Prev by Date: Re: Arthrotec 75
- Next by Date: Re: Snow on the way
- Previous by thread: Re: Arthrotec 75
- Next by thread: Re: Arthrotec 75
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|