Re: Cheney shoots fellow hunter

According to the news, Cheney admitted to having a beer with his
lunch--which they claimed was 5 hours before. (If it happened at 3:00
o'clock that would have made lunch at 10 a.m.?) I wouldn't call a beer at
lunch a problem, but the thing is that is just his word and the delay
involved raises suspicions that, if not true, could have been completely
dispelled with prompt reporting. The situation stinks of coverup! Which,
because of their actions may lead to totally unfair possible conclusions!

Barb C.
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aY6dnaiml_g67G7eRVn-jA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Alcohol wouldn't dissipate that fast. If they'd taken a blood test it
would have shown up. I understood the authorities were called just an
hour or two after the shooting; it was the press who wasn't notified until
later.

RaeMorrill wrote:
Well, we'll never know now will we? They can't do a test the next day and
find out. I'd bet in any case involving any other average citizen, one of
the first things a cop would ascertain is if there was alcohol involved
and if there were any suspicion, they'd be doing blood or breath tests to
determine if there was. Nice to be able to side-step that and get away
with it.


Phyllis Nilsson wrote:

Was he drinking?

Susan Mitchell wrote:

No, we won't be they are already saying this is outrageous and out of
bounds. We shouldn't touch this precious man. YUCK. I think they kept
him
from talking to local Sheriff's that night because he'd been drinking,
just
my very prejudiced opinion. Funny, this high moral ground party is so
devoid
of morals and good judgment on a daily basis and show it every single
time
something like this comes up. If you so much better, show us by your
actions and deeds!



.