Re: Shades of gray?

But so many "christians" do just this. They claim one thing, but then if anyone "judges" them on breaking God's law (clear word not minor stuff), they turn around and call them judgmentental.


Ed Chait wrote:
The problem with me thinking that everything issue is a shade of gray is that I can then rationalize and justify pretty much anything I want to do.

I believe a lot of the ills of our current society are due directly to that kind of thinking.

Everybody goes around saying "it's all good" these days.

It most definitely is not all good.

ed


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cambodia: Legal Foundation And Framework For The Countrys Judiciary Required
    ... Cambodia 's judges all the time. ... Press Release: Asian Human Rights Commission ... Cambodia: Legal Foundation And Framework For The Country's Judiciary ... become an integral part of Cambodian law. ...
    (soc.culture.cambodia)
  • Re: Sotomayor for SCOTUS and Racial Discrimination
    ... trying to convince people that "activist" judges should be stopped! ... appointed Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, ... ''interpret the law, not try to make law.'' Largely because of Chief ... activism should be outraged. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Bush vs. Gore: the triumph of Scholasticism?
    ... Not only is law what the judges say it is, ... enormous odds as you show below, to get her rights. ... In the formalistic reasoning of the Court, ...
    (misc.legal)
  • Re: Questions protesents wont awnser
    ... Read what Jesus said in Matthew Chapter 5. ... 17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: ... NOT us Christians who are NO LONGER UNDER THE LAW. ... You in turn run off and quote verses from Paul, ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: Hello from Russia
    ... fact that American courts do not recognize AFAIK international court's ... American law has become a Potemkin village, where a vast gulf separates official pronouncements from reality. ... While majorities can raise armies, elect leaders, and appoint judges, individuals have no recourse other than the courts, and if they will not enforce your rights at need, they become liberties, to be taken away by your betters in the government for any reason or no reason at all. ... As I explained it in an argument to our Supreme Court: ...
    (misc.legal)