Re: Shades of gray?
- From: "Ed Chait" <edchait4remove@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:37:05 GMT
"Su" <no.name@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rE6Wf.2750$V7.1157@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Ed Chait" <edchait4remove@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dZ5Wf.10988$k75.7004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In general, however, I see very little to no constructive criticism in
here in regards to discussions of spiritual belief, although I have
received some very encouraging and helpful constructive criticism in
email.
I'm going to ammend that because I have seen some constructive criticism
here in regards to spiritual belief, but only from one or two
individuals.
There's constructive and destructive criticism.
And when you feel one way and the majority of a group feels another, you
decide in advance if it's worth getting your keesta in the BBQ pit before
you spew forth destructive criticism on certain issues, particularly
religion.
Well, attempting to destroy people's beliefs and barbecuing my keister are
not priorities in my life today:). I don't have to consider those
activities for very long before I decide that my energy can be better spent.
ed
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Su
- Re: Shades of gray?
- References:
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Liz
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Su
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Su
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Sandi
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Ed Chait
- Re: Shades of gray?
- From: Su
- Re: Shades of gray?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Shades of gray?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Shades of gray?
- Previous by thread: Re: Shades of gray?
- Next by thread: Re: Shades of gray?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|