Re: backdating reports
- From: "Laura Gibson" <transpec3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:21:08 -0600
Yep, no way am I going to alter the legal document.
Laura
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GfSdnZgNgbzjprHZRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree with you. Altering a legal document is a crime. I wouldn't do it.
If the didn't get it done in time for reimbursement, then maybe he should
do better next time.
Laura Gibson wrote:
What the client wanted to know was if it was okay for him to change the
date dictated and date transcribed to backdate the reports about a year
or so. He was not even a client back then. The digital system
automatically records the actual dictation date and transcribe date. This
is against the law as altering the medical document, I believe, and is a
felony and also subject to ethics repercussions, I think.
Laura
<jmorngstar@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143746399.746696.260270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I will do anything that a client asks me to do. Well may be not
anything, but for the most part I don't care. They also know that if I
am ever asked the testify, then I will be saying, yes, I was asked to
put different dates on dictation. I have suggested to the client that I
put the real dates, and then put something about "redictated." I don't
take it as a reflection on me that it was lost.
Guess I have just been a whore way too long.
Janice
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Su
- Re: backdating reports
- References:
- backdating reports
- From: Laura Gibson
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Anne Vasquez
- Re: backdating reports
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Laura Gibson
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Phyllis Nilsson
- backdating reports
- Prev by Date: Re: backdating reports
- Next by Date: Re: OT question
- Previous by thread: Re: backdating reports
- Next by thread: Re: backdating reports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|