Re: backdating reports
- From: "Su" <no.name@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:18:11 -0600
That doesn't make it wrong or unethical, either.
If it was my medical record, I could care less *what* the dates of dictation
and transcription were originally or were changed to. It's the other stuff
that I'm concerned about (proper grammar and sentence structure, correctly
spelled words, accuracy regarding treatment received, etc.)
"Laura Gibson" <transpec3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NuWdnanvM_dporDZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah, it is doing what the client told you to do, and the client is
telling you to lie. That doesn't make it right or ethical.
Laura
"RaeMorrill" <RaeMorrill@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BZaXf.10403$Mj.5106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Not lying - it's doing what your client told you to do. It's not up to me
to be their conscience. If they tell me to put redictated on a report I
know darned well they never dictated in the first place, no different.
Phyllis Nilsson wrote:
I wouldn't lie in court, but I wouldn't lie on paper either.
RaeMorrill wrote:
I think it is totally unethical for a professional to ask for this.
However, it's not MY responsibility in end. Same would go for me
though. I'd certainly not lie about it in court. They should think of
that before they pull that stuff.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Laura Gibson
- Re: backdating reports
- References:
- backdating reports
- From: Laura Gibson
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Anne Vasquez
- Re: backdating reports
- From: jmorngstar
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Laura Gibson
- Re: backdating reports
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Phyllis Nilsson
- Re: backdating reports
- From: RaeMorrill
- Re: backdating reports
- From: Laura Gibson
- backdating reports
- Prev by Date: Re: backdating reports
- Next by Date: Re: OT question
- Previous by thread: Re: backdating reports
- Next by thread: Re: backdating reports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|