Re: backdating reports


Phyllis Nilsson wrote:
The doc wants to get reimbursed. He didn't do the paperwork on time to
get reimbursement, and now he wants someone else to lie for him so he
can get it.

Phyllis, you are making a big leap here. He can still get reimbursed
and it has nothing to do with the dates. He has a certain amount of
time to get the procedure billed. The date on the report has nothing to
do with it. He is probably doing this because he thinks it makes him
look bad. Stuff happens. Insurance companies know that. If they
hadn't received charges for other parts of the procedure, hospital,
clinic, lab, there might be some question that it was in fact done, but
I doubt that is the case here.

Janice

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cheney shoots fellow hunter
    ... Phyllis Nilsson wrote: ... under oath. ... RaeMorrill wrote: ... A lie is a lie. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: backdating reports
    ... A lie is a lie. ... If he dictated the patient had a broken left scapula in the cranium, I'd wager you wouldn't type it that way, even though it may have been an actual mistake on his part. ... He didn't do the paperwork on time to get reimbursement, and now he wants someone else to lie for him so he can get it. ... RaeMorrill wrote: ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
Quantcast