Re: The new 40?
- From: "Judity" <Judity01@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 May 2006 14:27:32 -0700
Bam, that reminds me of a comment my editor made about an older female
character in my book.
MY WORDS: The recruiter just stood there watching Jessie examine
Walker ever so slowly. He saw her start at his boss's long legs and
bring her eyes up inch by inch. Now and then, she would hesitate to
more fully explore an interesting section of his anatomy then continue,
ever upward.
MY EDITOR'S COMMENT: You know, women-even of child-bearing age-seldom
do this lingering scan upward the way men do; I find it hard to imagine
from an 87-year-old, no matter how sexual she continues to be.
So, how many of you women, no matter what your age, do like to examine
a fine specimen of a man in this way now and then? Come on, be honest,
even if you do it without his knowledge. I have, particularly when
he's walking away and has a nice...well, you get the idea.
Men, hush up! I can be a dirty old lady if I want.
Judity
Come drop by Walker's mansion
http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1082587
The Home of the Red Fox
http://judity.Writing.Com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Anne Vasquez
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Phyllis Nilsson
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Maureen
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Blupencl
- Re: The new 40?
- From: RMJCMT
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Bam
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Jeannie Wilson
- Re: The new 40?
- From: Susan Mitchell
- Re: The new 40?
- References:
- The new 40?
- From: Bam
- The new 40?
- Prev by Date: The new 40?
- Next by Date: Re: Sorry--political
- Previous by thread: The new 40?
- Next by thread: Re: The new 40?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
