Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: RaeMorrill <RaeMorrill@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:01:14 GMT
You mean labels like ***? Yeah, it is sad.
Liz wrote:
<im1whalen@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1149741725.731637.97310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
they're not bastards like the poor baby you're raising such a fuss about!!
Liz
How unkind and totally uncalled for - why are you calling the 'poor
baby' names based on the decisions her parents made - and please -
spare me dictionary defnitions - the name is a slur on the child who
has done absolutely nothing wrong.
Sorry to offend you but I call them as I see them and I doubt this child will be affected by my use of such a descriptive word. I will use my age (63) as the reason why I feel offended that so much speculation revolved around this child's first name without any consideration for her last name. In my youth if a girl got pregnant "out of wedlock" the parents would frequently move from the neighborhood! I remember two cases of that happening. Nowadays getting pregnant without the benefit of marriage is actually celebrated! How sad for the children of these unions to be saddled with labels they do not deserve.
Liz
- References:
- Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: jim
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: haggis
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: jim
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: Bam
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: jim
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: Liz
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: im1whalen@xxxxxxx
- Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- From: Liz
- Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- Prev by Date: The continuing saga of MTChat
- Next by Date: Re: and I thought I had seen it all
- Previous by thread: Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- Next by thread: Re: Shiloh-Nouvel Jolie-Pitt
- Index(es):