Re: 20/20 Report on PolyHeme

The secrecy seems to be in the fact that no one who was asked, in the towns
where it is being used, knew they product existed. Nor most of the country
know that any pharmaceutical could be given to them without their informed
consent. From the posts here, no one knew it existed before it hit the tv
news, yet it is being used, without informed consent, on people in 27
cities. If the news hadn't broken the story of the lack of informed
consent, none of us would have known about it, none of us would have
learned that, without their bracelet which no one has because no one knew
it existed, you or someone you know could be given a product whose safety
has not been proven to say nothing of its efficacy.

I have never said I am against testing. I am against testing against
someone's will; and if they don't give informed consent, it is obviously
against their will.

Jeannie Wilson wrote:


Well, you can never know something until you try it so without testing,
where would any of us be?

I didn't copy enough of your post but where is all the secrecy you are
referring to?


--
Toledo,Ohio

.

Quantcast